McKean v. Biddle
37 A. 528, 181 Pa. 361, 1897 Pa. LEXIS 552
Opinion
A careful consideration of this record has satisfied us that there is no substantial error in the conclusions reached by the court below.
For reasons given in its opinion the decree should not be disturbed.
Decree affirmed and appeal, dismissed at plaintiff’s costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McKean v. Biddle, 37 A. 528, 181 Pa. 361, 1897 Pa. LEXIS 552 (Pa. 1897).
37 A. 528 (McKean v. Biddle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gross v. Philadelphia Contributionship
73 Pa. D. & C.2d 654 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1975)
Order of R. Employees v. Commissioner
2 T.C. 607 (U.S. Tax Court, 1943)
Mutual Fire Ins. Co. of Germantown v. United States
50 F. Supp. 665 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1943)
Keystone Automobile Club Casualty Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
122 F.2d 886 (Third Circuit, 1941)
Driscoll v. Washington County Fire Ins.
110 F.2d 485 (Third Circuit, 1940)
Washington County Fire Ins. v. Driscoll
28 F. Supp. 224 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1939)
Canterbury School, Inc. v. Town of New Milford
149 A. 685 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1930)
Cochran v. Shetler
133 A. 232 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1926)
Commonwealth v. Philadelphia Contributionship
88 A. 929 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1913)