McKean v. Adam

City of New York Municipal Court

McKean v. Adam

7 Misc. 737

DecidedJuly 1, 1894

StatusPublished

This text of 7 Misc. 737 (McKean v. Adam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKean v. Adam, 7 Misc. 737 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Fitzsimons, J.

Evidently the trial justice made the order appealed from because he believed that he was induced to settle the case on appeal by deception and suppression of the truth on the part of the appellant’s attorney.

Under such circumstances it was not alone his right but his duty to make such an order, so that no injustice might be done respondent because of an incorrect and false record by the appellate court.

The order is affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Van Wyok, J., concurs.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fitzsimons, J.

Evidently the trial justice made the order appealed from because he believed that he was induced to settle the case on appeal by deception and suppression of the truth on the part of the appellant’s attorney.

Under such circumstances it was not alone his right but his duty to make such an order, so that no injustice might be done respondent because of an incorrect and false record by the appellate court.

The order is affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Van Wyok, J., concurs.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 Misc. 737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckean-v-adam-nynyccityct-1894.