McKean & Elk Land Imp. Co. v. Kane
This text of 24 A. 214 (McKean & Elk Land Imp. Co. v. Kane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case involves the same question as McKean and Elk Land and Improvement Co. v. Clay, just decided. There was undisputed evidence in this case, as well as in the one referred to, that the plaintiff had notice some ten or eleven years prior to the commencement of this action of the purchase by Kane of the land in question. The learned judge, therefore, properly held that the plaintiff’s claim was barred by the act of 1856.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 A. 214, 149 Pa. 286, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 1118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckean-elk-land-imp-co-v-kane-pa-1892.