McKay v. Syracuse Rapid Transit Railway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McKay v. Syracuse Rapid Transit Railway Co.

148 A.D. 935, 133 N.Y.S. 1131

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1912

StatusPublished

This text of 148 A.D. 935 (McKay v. Syracuse Rapid Transit Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKay v. Syracuse Rapid Transit Railway Co., 148 A.D. 935, 133 N.Y.S. 1131 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Held, that the finding of the j.ury that defendant was guilty of actionable negligence and that plaintiff’s intestate was free from contributory negligence is supported by sufficient evidence, and that the negligence of the plaintiff, if any, although the sole beneficiary, is not a bar to his recovery. (Lewin v. Lehigh Valley R. R. Co., 53 App. Div. 69.) All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Held, that the finding of the j.ury that defendant was guilty of actionable negligence and that plaintiff’s intestate was free from contributory negligence is supported by sufficient evidence, and that the negligence of the plaintiff, if any, although the sole beneficiary, is not a bar to his recovery. (Lewin v. Lehigh Valley R. R. Co., 53 App. Div. 69.) All concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

148 A.D. 935, 133 N.Y.S. 1131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckay-v-syracuse-rapid-transit-railway-co-nyappdiv-1912.