McKay v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

McKay v. State

963 S.W.2d 391, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 119, 1998 WL 15189

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 20, 1998

DocketNo. 71832

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 963 S.W.2d 391 (McKay v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKay v. State, 963 S.W.2d 391, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 119, 1998 WL 15189 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the order denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the order denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

963 S.W.2d 391, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 119, 1998 WL 15189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckay-v-state-moctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack