McKay v. State
963 S.W.2d 391, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 119, 1998 WL 15189
Opinion
ORDER
Movant appeals from the order denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McKay v. State, 963 S.W.2d 391, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 119, 1998 WL 15189 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).
963 S.W.2d 391 (McKay v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eirtis McKay v. James D. Purkett
Eighth Circuit, 2001