McKay v. Ragan

27 Ga. 203
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 15, 1859
StatusPublished

This text of 27 Ga. 203 (McKay v. Ragan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McKay v. Ragan, 27 Ga. 203 (Ga. 1859).

Opinion

By the Court.

Lumpkin J.

delivering opinion.

A ca. sa. bond to take the benefit of the Insolvent Debtors Act is returnable to a particular Court. The case is reached in its order and called; and there being no appearance by the principal or his security, judgment is taken on the bond. Afterwards, and after the jury were discharged, the debtor is surrendered in open Court by the attorney of Little, his bondsman. And upon motion, the judgment is vacated, Little exonerated, and the case continued until the ensuing Term of the Court.

We concur with the Circuit Judge, that the Inferior Court was manifestly wrong in allowing the judgment to be opened and set aside, by the delivery of the debtor. Great mischiefs would result from such a practice.

Judgment affirmed.

McDonald J. absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 Ga. 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckay-v-ragan-ga-1859.