McKay v. McKnight

U.S. Circuit Court

McKay v. McKnight

5 F. 593

DecidedJuly 1, 1881

StatusPublished

This text of 5 F. 593 (McKay v. McKnight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKay v. McKnight, 5 F. 593 (uscirct 1881).

Pincite

Opinion

Nixon, D. J.

The preliminary injunction is allowed in the above case, not only for the reason stated in the opinion in the case of the same complainant against Dibert, but for the additional reason that the defendant William McKnight, as licensee of the complainant, is estopped by the express terms of his contract from setting up the defences which have been brought forward in excuse of the infringement by the defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nixon, D. J.

The preliminary injunction is allowed in the above case, not only for the reason stated in the opinion in the case of the same complainant against Dibert, but for the additional reason that the defendant William McKnight, as licensee of the complainant, is estopped by the express terms of his contract from setting up the defences which have been brought forward in excuse of the infringement by the defendants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 F. 593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckay-v-mcknight-uscirct-1881.