McKay v. McKnight

U.S. Circuit Court

McKay v. McKnight

5 F. 593

United States Circuit Court·Decided July 1, 1881·Published

Opinion

Nixon, D. J.

The preliminary injunction is allowed in the above case, not only for the reason stated in the opinion in the case of the same complainant against Dibert, but for the additional reason that the defendant William McKnight, as licensee of the complainant, is estopped by the express terms of his contract from setting up the defences which have been brought forward in excuse of the infringement by the defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nixon, D. J.

The preliminary injunction is allowed in the above case, not only for the reason stated in the opinion in the case of the same complainant against Dibert, but for the additional reason that the defendant William McKnight, as licensee of the complainant, is estopped by the express terms of his contract from setting up the defences which have been brought forward in excuse of the infringement by the defendants.

McKay v. McKnight, 5 F. 593 (uscirct 1881).

Pincite

5 F. 593 (McKay v. McKnight) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.