McKay v. McKay
This text of 933 N.E.2d 812 (McKay v. McKay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Montgomery App. No. 23702, 2010-Ohio-3348. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for leave to redact personal identifying information,
It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted, and appellant shall come to the Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk’s office and redact all personal identifiers, as defined by Rule 44(H) of the Rules of Superintendence for the Courts of Ohio, in this case within ten days of the date of this entry.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
933 N.E.2d 812, 126 Ohio St. 3d 1562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckay-v-mckay-ohio-2010.