McKay v. Jones

Fourth Circuit

McKay v. Jones

547 F. App'x 238

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 26, 2013·No. No. 13-7115·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Michael John McKay appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the denial of relief for the reasons stated by the district court. McKay v. Jones, No. 1:13-cv-00649-JCC-JFA (E.D.Va. July 3, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Michael John McKay appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the denial of relief for the reasons stated by the district court. McKay v. Jones, No. 1:13-cv-00649-JCC-JFA (E.D.Va. July 3, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

McKay v. Jones, 547 F. App'x 238 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

547 F. App'x 238 (McKay v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.