McKay v. Jones

Fourth Circuit

McKay v. Jones

547 F. App'x 238

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedNovember 26, 2013

DocketNo. 13-7115

StatusPublished

This text of 547 F. App'x 238 (McKay v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKay v. Jones, 547 F. App'x 238 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Michael John McKay appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the denial of relief for the reasons stated by the district court. McKay v. Jones, No. 1:13-cv-00649-JCC-JFA (E.D.Va. July 3, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Michael John McKay appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the denial of relief for the reasons stated by the district court. McKay v. Jones, No. 1:13-cv-00649-JCC-JFA (E.D.Va. July 3, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

547 F. App'x 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckay-v-jones-ca4-2013.