McKay v. Hall

Court of Appeals of Georgia

McKay v. Hall

248 S.E.2d 210, 147 Ga. App. 146, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2819

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 11, 1978

Docket55690

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 248 S.E.2d 210 (McKay v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKay v. Hall, 248 S.E.2d 210, 147 Ga. App. 146, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2819 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Banke, Judge.

This action for slander was filed by the plaintiff-appellee in the Superior Court of Monroe County. Only one of the defendants, Larry Thornton, was a resident of Monroe County. The other two, Robert McKay and Vernon Sweetan, were served by second original in their respective counties of residence.

The jury returned the following verdict: "We the Jury finds [sic] the defendants guilty as charged: We ask Robert McKay to pay $10,000 dollars and Vernon Sweeten to pay $10,000 to the Plaintiff Harold Hall.” The trial judge entered judgment against all three defendants accordingly, assessing damages only against McKay and Sweeten. McKay and Sweeten appeal the denial of their motion to set aside the judgment, contending that the verdict amounted to a finding in favor of Thornton and thus deprived the court of jurisdiction to enter a judgment against them. Held:

We agree that since no damages were assessed against Thornton, he was absolved from any liability in the case. Cf. Mayor &c. of Washington v. Calhoun, 103 Ga. 675 (1) (30 SE 434) (1898). See 89 CJS 160, Trial, § 497. This amounted to a verdict in his favor and therefore deprived the court of jurisdiction to enter judgment against the two nonresident defendants. See Southeastern Truck Lines v. Rann, 214 Ga. 813 (108 SE2d 561) (1959); Steding &c. Corp. v. Cunningham & Assoc., 137 Ga. App. 165 (1) (223 SE2d 217) (1976).

It was accordingly error to deny the motion to set aside the verdict.

Judgment reversed.

Deen, P. J., and Smith, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Banke, Judge.

This action for slander was filed by the plaintiff-appellee in the Superior Court of Monroe County. Only one of the defendants, Larry Thornton, was a resident of Monroe County. The other two, Robert McKay and Vernon Sweetan, were served by second original in their respective counties of residence.

The jury returned the following verdict: "We the Jury finds [sic] the defendants guilty as charged: We ask Robert McKay to pay $10,000 dollars and Vernon Sweeten to pay $10,000 to the Plaintiff Harold Hall.” The trial judge entered judgment against all three defendants accordingly, assessing damages only against McKay and Sweeten. McKay and Sweeten appeal the denial of their motion to set aside the judgment, contending that the verdict amounted to a finding in favor of Thornton and thus deprived the court of jurisdiction to enter a judgment against them. Held:

We agree that since no damages were assessed against Thornton, he was absolved from any liability in the case. Cf. Mayor &c. of Washington v. Calhoun, 103 Ga. 675 (1) (30 SE 434) (1898). See 89 CJS 160, Trial, § 497. This amounted to a verdict in his favor and therefore deprived the court of jurisdiction to enter judgment against the two nonresident defendants. See Southeastern Truck Lines v. Rann, 214 Ga. 813 (108 SE2d 561) (1959); Steding &c. Corp. v. Cunningham & Assoc., 137 Ga. App. 165 (1) (223 SE2d 217) (1976).

It was accordingly error to deny the motion to set aside the verdict.

Judgment reversed.

Deen, P. J., and Smith, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 S.E.2d 210, 147 Ga. App. 146, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckay-v-hall-gactapp-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack