McKay v. Fulgham

Court of Appeals of Texas

McKay v. Fulgham

220 S.W. 171

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedMarch 3, 1920

DocketNo. 1616.

StatusPublished

This text of 220 S.W. 171 (McKay v. Fulgham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKay v. Fulgham, 220 S.W. 171 (Tex. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

I-ITJFF, C. J.

This is a companion case with 1615, McKay v. Tally, 220 S. W. 167, this day handed down. The allegations for cancellation of the oil lease are substantially the same as in that case. The terms of the lease are the same here as there, and the facts established on the trial are identical, except that $96 was paid before the time limit expired to the Wor-sham Banking Company.

This ease will be ruled by the Tally Case, and upon the authority of that ease we reverse and render this one.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

I-ITJFF, C. J.

This is a companion case with 1615, McKay v. Tally, 220 S. W. 167, this day handed down. The allegations for cancellation of the oil lease are substantially the same as in that case. The terms of the lease are the same here as there, and the facts established on the trial are identical, except that $96 was paid before the time limit expired to the Wor-sham Banking Company.

This ease will be ruled by the Tally Case, and upon the authority of that ease we reverse and render this one.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

220 S.W. 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckay-v-fulgham-texapp-1920.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack