McKay v. City of Oswego

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McKay v. City of Oswego

115 A.D. 884, 104 N.Y.S. 1132

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 15, 1906

StatusPublished

This text of 115 A.D. 884 (McKay v. City of Oswego) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKay v. City of Oswego, 115 A.D. 884, 104 N.Y.S. 1132 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order denying motion for new trial under section 999 of the Code of Civil Procedure reversed and a new trial granted on the facts, with costs to the appellant - to abide the event,unless the plaintiff stipulates to reduce the verdict to the sum of $500, as of the date .of the rendition thereof, in which event the judgment, as thus modified, and the order are affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., not sitting, and Nash, J., who dissented and voted for new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order denying motion for new trial under section 999 of the Code of Civil Procedure reversed and a new trial granted on the facts, with costs to the appellant - to abide the event,unless the plaintiff stipulates to reduce the verdict to the sum of $500, as of the date .of the rendition thereof, in which event the judgment, as thus modified, and the order are affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., not sitting, and Nash, J., who dissented and voted for new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 A.D. 884, 104 N.Y.S. 1132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckay-v-city-of-oswego-nyappdiv-1906.