McKay v. Ciani

267 A.D.2d 581, 698 N.Y.S.2d 562, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12462

This text of 267 A.D.2d 581 (McKay v. Ciani) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McKay v. Ciani, 267 A.D.2d 581, 698 N.Y.S.2d 562, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12462 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—Appeal from that part of an order of the Supreme Court (Caruso, J.), entered September 15, 1998 in Schenectady County, which denied de[582]*582fendant Joseph Ciani’s motion to amend his answer to assert affirmative defenses.

We agree with the rationale expressed by Supreme Court in determining the motion and add merely that leave to amend is not to be granted where the only merit shown, as here, is that the proposed amendment “flows logically from the facts of [the] case” (Marpe v Dolmetsch, 246 AD2d 723, 724).

Cardona, P. J., MikoII, Mercure, Yesawich Jr. and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marpe v. Dolmetsch
246 A.D.2d 723 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
267 A.D.2d 581, 698 N.Y.S.2d 562, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckay-v-ciani-nyappdiv-1999.