McKay v. Atwood

Third Circuit

McKay v. Atwood

76 F.2d 1014, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 2798

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedMarch 20, 1935

DocketNo. 5502

StatusPublished

This text of 76 F.2d 1014 (McKay v. Atwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKay v. Atwood, 76 F.2d 1014, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 2798 (3d Cir. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

In the court below, the trustees of the estate of James McKay filed a bill against the receiver of the Duquesne National Bank to have the bank adjudged to have held some $11,000 as a trust account which should be paid in preference to general depositors. On final hearing, the court below dismissed the bill. Thereupon the trustees, took this appeal.

The case turns on the construction of written documents, depends on its own facts, and no general principles are involved. Those writings were analyzed and construed in a comprehensive opinion.

Finding ourselves in accord therewith, we affirm the case on the judge’s opinión (D. C.) 10 F. Supp. 475.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

In the court below, the trustees of the estate of James McKay filed a bill against the receiver of the Duquesne National Bank to have the bank adjudged to have held some $11,000 as a trust account which should be paid in preference to general depositors. On final hearing, the court below dismissed the bill. Thereupon the trustees, took this appeal.

The case turns on the construction of written documents, depends on its own facts, and no general principles are involved. Those writings were analyzed and construed in a comprehensive opinion.

Finding ourselves in accord therewith, we affirm the case on the judge’s opinión (D. C.) 10 F. Supp. 475.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

76 F.2d 1014, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 2798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckay-v-atwood-ca3-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack