McKasson v. Huntworth

105 P.2d 44, 5 Wash. 2d 661
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 17, 1940
DocketNo. 28044.
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 105 P.2d 44 (McKasson v. Huntworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McKasson v. Huntworth, 105 P.2d 44, 5 Wash. 2d 661 (Wash. 1940).

Opinion

Simpson, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action to determine their ownership in a strip of land upon which their predecessor in interest and the adjoining land owners, defendants in this case, had placed a portion of a concrete driveway. The case was tried to the court and a decree entered permanently enjoining defendants from using that portion of the driveway located upon plaintiffs’ property. Defendants appealed.

The assignments of error are that the court erred in not giving appellants judgment at the close of plaintiffs’ case, and that the decision is contrary to the law and against the evidence.

The decree was signed by the trial judge and filed in the office of the county clerk February 10, 1940. The statement of facts was filed in the clerk’s office May 20, 1940, more than ninety days after the entry of the final *662 judgment. The statement of facts was not filed within the period of time allowed by Rule IX, Rules of the Supreme Court, 193 Wash. 9-a, in effect August 1, 1938.

The filing of a statement of facts within the time provided by the rule is jurisdictional. Nudd v. Seattle, 188 Wash. 273, 62 P. (2d) 43; Louring v. Louring, 199 Wash. 351, 91 P. (2d) 729. In compliance with the rule and in accordance with our former decisions, we are compelled to strike the statement of facts.

It is clearly apparent that the error urged by appellants cannot be considered without recourse to the evidence in the case.- Inasmuch as we do not have the evidence before us, we affirm the judgment.

All Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hamilton v. Kiona-Benton Irrigation District
268 P.2d 446 (Washington Supreme Court, 1954)
Black v. Porter
198 P.2d 670 (Washington Supreme Court, 1948)
Wheeler v. S. Birch & Sons Construction Co.
178 P.2d 331 (Washington Supreme Court, 1947)
State Ex Rel. Grange Store v. Riddell
177 P.2d 78 (Washington Supreme Court, 1947)
Bennett v. McKellips
111 P.2d 558 (Washington Supreme Court, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 P.2d 44, 5 Wash. 2d 661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckasson-v-huntworth-wash-1940.