McKain v. United States

Fourth Circuit

McKain v. United States

37 F. App'x 671

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 19, 2002·No. No. 02-6627·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Charles Anton McKain appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for the return of property and the marginal order denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McKain v. United States, No. CA-02-474B (D. Md. Mar. 22 & Apr. 2, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the [672] facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Charles Anton McKain appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for the return of property and the marginal order denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McKain v. United States, No. CA-02-474B (D. Md. Mar. 22 & Apr. 2, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the [672] facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

McKain v. United States, 37 F. App'x 671 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

37 F. App'x 671 (McKain v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.