McKain v. United States
This text of McKain v. United States (McKain v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6627
CHARLES ANTON MCKAIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-02-474-B)
Submitted: June 13, 2002 Decided: June 19, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Anton McKain, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Charles Kay, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Charles Anton McKain appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for the return of property and the marginal
order denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See McKain v. United States, No. CA-02-474-B (D. Md. Mar. 22
& Apr. 2, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
McKain v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckain-v-united-states-ca4-2002.