McIver v. Wattles
22 U.S. 650, 6 L. Ed. 182, 9 Wheat. 650, 1824 U.S. LEXIS 403
Opinion
M`IVER and others
v.
WATTLES.
Supreme Court of United States.
Mr. Taylor, for the defendant in error, moved for costs.
Mr. Chief Justice MARSHALL said, that in all cases where the cause is dismissed for want of jurisdiction, no costs are allowed.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McIver v. Wattles, 22 U.S. 650, 6 L. Ed. 182, 9 Wheat. 650, 1824 U.S. LEXIS 403 (1824).
22 U.S. 650 (McIver v. Wattles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
(HC) Baker v. Lizarraga
E.D. California, 2023
Otay Land Co. v. UNITED ENTERPRISES LTD.
672 F.3d 1152 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)
Ali v. Prestige Window & Door Installation, LLC.
626 F. Supp. 2d 1259 (S.D. Florida, 2009)
Michael Callicrate v. Farmland Industries, Inc.
139 F.3d 1336 (Tenth Circuit, 1998)
Callicrate v. Farmland Industries, Inc.
139 F.3d 1336 (Tenth Circuit, 1998)
Ericsson GE Mobile Communications, Inc. v. Motorola Communications & Electronics, Inc.
179 F.R.D. 328 (N.D. Alabama, 1998)
Edward W. Gillen Co. v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance
166 F.R.D. 25 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1996)
Eugene R. Signorile, V, Quaker Oats Company
499 F.2d 142 (Seventh Circuit, 1974)
In Re Northern Indiana Oil Co. Moore v. Fletcher
192 F.2d 139 (Seventh Circuit, 1951)
Lion Bonding & Surety Co. v. Karatz
262 U.S. 640 (Supreme Court, 1923)
Devost v. Twin State Gas & Electric Co.
252 F. 125 (First Circuit, 1918)
Reynolds v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.
224 Mass. 253 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1916)
United States Envelope Co. v. Transo Paper Co.
229 F. 576 (D. Connecticut, 1916)
Bice v. Boothsville Telephone Co.
59 S.E. 501 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1907)
Pellett v. Great Northern Ry. Co.
105 F. 194 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington, 1900)
County of Thurston v. Scammell
34 P. 470 (Washington Supreme Court, 1893)
Pentlarge v. Kirby
20 F. 898 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1884)
Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. Swan
111 U.S. 379 (Supreme Court, 1884)
State v. Thompson
81 Mo. 163 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1883)
Mead v. Platt
17 F. 836 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1883)