McIver-Morgan, Inc. v. Dal Piaz

New York Court of Appeals

McIver-Morgan, Inc. v. Dal Piaz

5 N.E.3d 586, 22 N.Y.3d 1104

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 18, 2014

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 5 N.E.3d 586 (McIver-Morgan, Inc. v. Dal Piaz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McIver-Morgan, Inc. v. Dal Piaz, 5 N.E.3d 586, 22 N.Y.3d 1104 (N.Y. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and the certified question not answered upon the ground that it is unnecessary. The Appellate Division correctly determined that vacatur of the arbitration award would require an impermissible fact-intensive review by the courts.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Abdus-Salaam. Taking no part: Judge Rivera.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and the certified question not answered upon the ground that it is unnecessary. The Appellate Division correctly determined that vacatur of the arbitration award would require an impermissible fact-intensive review by the courts.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Abdus-Salaam. Taking no part: Judge Rivera.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 N.E.3d 586, 22 N.Y.3d 1104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mciver-morgan-inc-v-dal-piaz-ny-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack