McIntyre v. Wright

Oregon Supreme Court

McIntyre v. Wright

643 P.2d 338, 292 Or. 784, 1982 Ore. LEXIS 814

CourtOregon Supreme Court

DecidedApril 6, 1982

DocketCA 19231, SC 28239

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 643 P.2d 338 (McIntyre v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McIntyre v. Wright, 643 P.2d 338, 292 Or. 784, 1982 Ore. LEXIS 814 (Or. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

TANZER, J.

This is a post-decree garnishment proceeding in a dissolution suit. The trial court allowed a continuing garnishment against defendant’s workers’ compensation benefits in the hands of the insurer. The Court of Appeals modified.

The issues in this case are identical to those presented in the case of Satterfield v. Satterfield, 292 Or 780, 643 P2d 336 (1982) (decided this date). Our decision in this case is based upon the reasons expressed in our opinion in Satterfield.

The Court of Appeals allowance of the garnishment is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TANZER, J.

This is a post-decree garnishment proceeding in a dissolution suit. The trial court allowed a continuing garnishment against defendant’s workers’ compensation benefits in the hands of the insurer. The Court of Appeals modified.

The issues in this case are identical to those presented in the case of Satterfield v. Satterfield, 292 Or 780, 643 P2d 336 (1982) (decided this date). Our decision in this case is based upon the reasons expressed in our opinion in Satterfield.

The Court of Appeals allowance of the garnishment is reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

643 P.2d 338, 292 Or. 784, 1982 Ore. LEXIS 814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcintyre-v-wright-or-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack