McIntyre v. Western Union Tel. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

McIntyre v. Western Union Tel. Co.

113 F. 1022, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4748

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided September 24, 1901·Published

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

This motion is now denied upon the following terms, viz.: That defendant on November 1, 1901, and monthly thereafter, file in this court sworn statements showing how many of the devices complained of have been used by it, where in such use the device was twisted as shown in the patent. In the event of failure to file such affidavits, or affidavits showing that none were twisted, complainant may renew this application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

This motion is now denied upon the following terms, viz.: That defendant on November 1, 1901, and monthly thereafter, file in this court sworn statements showing how many of the devices complained of have been used by it, where in such use the device was twisted as shown in the patent. In the event of failure to file such affidavits, or affidavits showing that none were twisted, complainant may renew this application.

McIntyre v. Western Union Tel. Co., 113 F. 1022, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4748 (circtsdny 1901).

Pincite

113 F. 1022 (McIntyre v. Western Union Tel. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.