McIntyre v. State

210 So. 3d 71, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10324
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 6, 2016·No. No. 2D16-258·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Mosley, 149 So.3d 684 (Fla.2014); Cotto v. State, 139 So.3d 283 (Fla.2014); Gandy v. State, 163 [72]*72So.3d 623 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015); Claycomb v. State, 142 So.3d 916 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).

SILBERMAN, WALLACE, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McIntyre v. State, 210 So. 3d 71, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10324 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

210 So. 3d 71 (McIntyre v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Josue Cotto v. State of Florida
139 So. 3d 283 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2014)
Larry Claycomb v. State of Florida
142 So. 3d 916 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
State of Florida v. Frank A. Mosley
149 So. 3d 684 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2014)
Joseph Gandy v. State
163 So. 3d 623 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)