McIntyre v. State
753 So. 2d 787, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3720, 2000 WL 313581
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 29, 2000·No. No. 98-3016·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Johnny McIntyre appeals his convictions for armed robbery, aggravated assault and aggravated battery. Appointed counsel has filed an Anders1 brief. Defendant-appellant McIntyre has filed a pro se brief. We conclude that the Anders proceeding is appropriate. As to appellant’s pro se brief contending that he does not qualify as a habitual offender, we conclude he does qualify. See Rollins v. State, 707 So.2d 823 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McIntyre v. State, 753 So. 2d 787, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3720, 2000 WL 313581 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
753 So. 2d 787 (McIntyre v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Crapp v. CRIMINAL JUSTICE STANDARDS AND TRAINING COM'N
753 So. 2d 787 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)