McIntyre v. State

559 So. 2d 388, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2403, 1990 WL 40326
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McIntyre v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 539 So. 2d 603
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 10, 1990·No. No. 90-0310·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Edmund Kite McIntyre, appeals from a trial court order denying his motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm the order of the trial court based upon a holding that the motion was untimely filed pursuant to the two-year limitations period prescribed in rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure; and appellant’s claims do not fall within either of the two exceptions to application of the time limit set forth in that rule. Johnson v. State, 536 So.2d 1009 (Fla.1989); Delap v. State, 513 So.2d 1050 (Fla.1987); Saccucci v. State, 546 So.2d 1154 (Fla. 2d DCA [389]*3891989); see Whiddon v. Dugger, 894 F.2d 1266 (11th Cir.1990).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McIntyre v. State, 559 So. 2d 388, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2403, 1990 WL 40326 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

559 So. 2d 388 (McIntyre v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Delap v. State
513 So. 2d 1050 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)
Johnson v. State
536 So. 2d 1009 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Saccucci v. State
546 So. 2d 1154 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)