McIntyre v. NewYork-Presbyterian Global Servs., LLC

2025 NY Slip Op 32328(U)
CourtNew York Supreme Court, New York County
DecidedJuly 1, 2025
DocketIndex No. 152854/2021
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 32328(U) (McIntyre v. NewYork-Presbyterian Global Servs., LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McIntyre v. NewYork-Presbyterian Global Servs., LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 32328(U) (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2025).

Opinion

McIntyre v NewYork-Presbyterian Global Servs., LLC 2025 NY Slip Op 32328(U) July 1, 2025 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 152854/2021 Judge: Mary V. Rosado Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/01/2025 04:45 PM INDEX NO. 152854/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/01/2025

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. MARY V. ROSADO PART 33M Justice --------------------X INDEX NO. 152854/2021 BRIAN MCINTYRE, MOTION DATE 03/25/2025 Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. 002 - V -

NEWYORK-PRESBYTERIAN GLOBAL SERVICES, DECISION + ORDER ON LLC,TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, MOTION Defendant. --------------------X

NEWYORK-PRESBYTERIAN GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC, Third-Party TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Index No. 595210/2023

Plaintiff,

-against-

CARDOZA PLUMBING CORP.

Defendant. -------------------X NEWYORK-PRESBYTERIAN GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC, Second Third-Party TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Index No. 595285/2025

ADCO ELECTRIC CORPORATION

Defendant. -------------------X

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 002) 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67,68,69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79,83,84,85 were read on this motion to/for SEVER ACTION

Upon the foregoing documents, and after a final submission date of May 20, 2025, Plaintiff

Brian McIntyre's motion to sever the Second Third-Party Complaint is granted. Pursuant to a status

conference held on February 26, 2025, the parties memorialized that all discovery was complete

152854/2021 MCINTYRE, BRIAN vs. NEWYORK-PRESBYTERIAN GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC ET Page 1 of 4 AL Motion No. 002

[* 1] 1 of 4 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/01/2025 04:45 PM INDEX NO. 152854/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/01/2025

aside from the exchange of the parties' independent medical exam reports (NYSCEF Doc. 64).

Because the only discovery remaining was the exchange of expert reports, and given the age of

the case, the Court allowed the exchange of independent medical exam reports to take place after

the parties' deadline to file the note of issue, which was March 26, 2025. As a result, Plaintiff filed

his note of issue on February 27, 2025. Nonetheless, Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs/Second

Third-Party Plaintiffs New York Presbyterian Global Services, LLC and Turner Construction

Company ("Defendants/Second Third-Party Plaintiffs") did not file their Second Third-Party

Complaint until March 18, 2025 (NYSCEF Doc. 54). Plaintiff now moves to sever the Second

Third-Party Complaint. In motion sequence 003, Second Third-Party Defendant Adco Electric

Corporation ("Adco") also moves to sever the Second Third-Party Complaint. Defendants/Second

Third-Party Plaintiffs oppose. For the following reasons, Plaintiffs motion is granted.

Despite this action being conferenced at least seven times over the span of years, and

despite having filed a third-party complaint in 2023, Defendants/Second Third-Party Plaintiffs

never put the Court on notice of their intention to file a Second Third-Party Complaint. There is

no reasonable excuse for Defendants/Second Third-Party Plaintiffs dilatory actions.

Defendants/Second Third-Party Plaintiffs are the alleged owner and general contractor of the

construction site where Plaintiff was injured-their assertion that they did not know about Adco's

existence until 2025 is disingenuous. As general contractor, Defendants/Second Third-Party

Plaintiffs should have or could have known about Adco' s existence if the proper diligence had

been exercised. Indeed, Defendants/Second Third-Party Plaintiffs specifically allege in the Second

Third-Party Complaint that there exists a contract between Adco and Defendants/Second Third-

Party Plaintiffs, and that Adco was to insure Defendants/Second Third-Party Plaintiffs,

highlighting their knowledge of Adco's existence and presence on the site.

152854/2021 MCINTYRE, BRIAN vs. NEWYORK-PRESBYTERIAN GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC ET Page 2 of4 AL Motion No. 002

[* 2] 2 of 4 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/01/2025 04:45 PM INDEX NO. 152854/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/01/2025

Moreover, at the February 26, 2025 status conference all parties agreed that discovery in

the main action and the first third-party action was complete, and the note of issue was filed prior

to the Second Third-Party Complaint being filed.

Given this posture, the Court finds that allowing the Second Third-Party Complaint to stand

would be unduly prejudicial to Plaintiff in delaying his trial (see, e.g. WVH Housing Dev. Fund

Corp. v Brooklyn Insulation and Soundproofing, Inc., 193 AD3d 523, 523-24 [1st Dept 2021];

Maron v Magnetic Const. Group Corp., 128 AD3d 426,427 [1st Dept 2015]; Torres v Cisto Realty

Corp., 106 AD3d 645 [1st Dept 2013]). It would also prejudice the Second Third-Party Defendant

Adco, who was brought into this action after years of discovery (Lopez v Halletts Astoria LLC,

205 AD3d 573, 574 [1st Dept 2022]). Nor is there any risk of inconsistent verdicts as Adco's

liability is contingent on a finding of liability against Defendants/Second-Third Party Plaintiffs

(see also Admiral Indem. Co. v Popular Plumbing & Heating Corp., 127 AD3d 419 [1st Dept

2015]). Therefore, Plaintiffs motion is granted.

Accordingly, it is hereby,

ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion to sever the Second Third-Party Complaint is granted,

and the Second Third-Party Action bearing Index No. 595285/2025 is severed from the main action

bearing Index No. 152854/2021 and the Third-Party Action bearing index No. 595210/2023; and

it is further

ORDERED that within ten days of entry, Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this order with

notice of entry on the Clerk of this Court (60 Centre Street, Room 141B); and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Decision and Order with notice of entry

on all parties in this action via NYSCEF, and shall serve notice of entry on the office of the General

Clerk in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Protocol on Courthouse and County Clerk

152854/2021 MCINTYRE, BRIAN vs. NEWYORK-PRESBYTERIAN GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC ET Page 3 of4 AL Motion No. 002

[* 3] 3 of 4 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/01/2025 04:45 PM INDEX NO. 152854/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 128 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/01/2025

Procedures for Electronically Filed Cases (accessible at the "E-Filing" page on the court's

website), and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, upon service of a copy of this order with notice of

entry, shall sever the Second Third-Party Action bearing Index No. 595285/2025 from the main

action bearing Index No. 152854/2021 and the Third-Party Action bearing index No. 595210/2023,

and the Clerk of the Court shall record such action in the Clerk's records; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall amend the caption to remove the Second

Third-Party Action; and it is further

ORDRED that within ten days of entry, counsel for Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this

Decision and Order, with notice of entry, on all parties via NYSCEF.

This constitutes the Decision and Order of the Court.

RY V. OSADO, J.S.C.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Admiral Indemnity Co. v. Popular Plumbing & Heating Corp.
127 A.D.3d 419 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Maron v. Magnetic Construction Group Corp.
128 A.D.3d 426 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
WVH Hous. Dev. Fund Corp. v. Brooklyn Insulation & Soundproofing, Inc.
2021 NY Slip Op 02264 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 32328(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcintyre-v-newyork-presbyterian-global-servs-llc-nysupctnewyork-2025.