McIntyre v. McIntyre

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McIntyre v. McIntyre

216 A.D.2d 300, 627 N.Y.S.2d 982, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5918

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 5, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 216 A.D.2d 300 (McIntyre v. McIntyre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McIntyre v. McIntyre, 216 A.D.2d 300, 627 N.Y.S.2d 982, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5918 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

In a custody proceeding, the petitioner father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County (Meyer, J.), dated November 9, 1993, which granted the mother’s application to dismiss his petition, made at the close of his case at a custody hearing, on the ground that he had failed to present a prima facie case for a change of custody from the mother to him.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The determination of the Family Court that it was in the child’s best interests for custody to remain with his mother had a sound and substantial basis in the record (see, Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167,173).

We have considered the petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Bracken, J. P., Ritter, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a custody proceeding, the petitioner father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County (Meyer, J.), dated November 9, 1993, which granted the mother’s application to dismiss his petition, made at the close of his case at a custody hearing, on the ground that he had failed to present a prima facie case for a change of custody from the mother to him.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The determination of the Family Court that it was in the child’s best interests for custody to remain with his mother had a sound and substantial basis in the record (see, Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167,173).

We have considered the petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Bracken, J. P., Ritter, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

216 A.D.2d 300, 627 N.Y.S.2d 982, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcintyre-v-mcintyre-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack