McIntyre v. Jones
88 S.E. 419, 17 Ga. App. 760, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 915
This text of 88 S.E. 419 (McIntyre v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McIntyre v. Jones, 88 S.E. 419, 17 Ga. App. 760, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 915 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).
Opinion
The action being by the personal representative of a decedent, and it appearing that the witness by whom the defendant sought to prove the plea of payment was the defendant’s agent and likewise interested in the result of the suit, the exclusion of the testimony of this witness was proper. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Campbell v. Walker
92 S.E. 545 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
88 S.E. 419, 17 Ga. App. 760, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcintyre-v-jones-gactapp-1916.