McIntyre v. Jones
88 S.E. 419, 17 Ga. App. 760, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 915
Opinion
The action being by the personal representative of a decedent, and it appearing that the witness by whom the defendant sought to prove the plea of payment was the defendant’s agent and likewise interested in the result of the suit, the exclusion of the testimony of this witness was proper. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McIntyre v. Jones, 88 S.E. 419, 17 Ga. App. 760, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 915 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).
88 S.E. 419 (McIntyre v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Campbell v. Walker
92 S.E. 545 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)