McIntyre v. Habersham Bank
Opinion
Under the facts and procedure as here presented, it was,not error to vacate the previous judgment of the court and reinstate the case on the docket for trial. Civil Code (1910), § 5958. Ford v. Clark, 129 Ga. 292 (58 S. E. 818); Turner v. Jordan, 67 Ga. 604; East Tenn. Railway Co. v. Greene, 95 Ga. 35, 37, (22 S. E. 36); Gillespie v. Farkas, 19 Ga. App. 158 (91 S. E. 244).
Judgment affirmed.
cited: Civil Code (1910), §§ 6221, 6278, 6280, 5965; Read Phosphate Co. v. Wells, 18 Ga. App. 656-7.
cited: Civil Code (1910), §§ 4964, 4955, 6278; Hughes v. Coursey, 46 Ga. 116; East Tenn. &c. Ry. Co. v. Greene, 95 Ga. 37; McWilliams v. Standard &c. Co., 92 Ga. 438-9.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
95 S.E. 306 (McIntyre v. Habersham Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.