McIntyre v. Habersham Bank

95 S.E. 306, 22 Ga. App. 21, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 109
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 13, 1918·No. 8952·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Jenkins, J.

Under the facts and procedure as here presented, it was,not error to vacate the previous judgment of the court and reinstate the case on the docket for trial. Civil Code (1910), § 5958. Ford v. Clark, 129 Ga. 292 (58 S. E. 818); Turner v. Jordan, 67 Ga. 604; East Tenn. Railway Co. v. Greene, 95 Ga. 35, 37, (22 S. E. 36); Gillespie v. Farkas, 19 Ga. App. 158 (91 S. E. 244).

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and Luke, J., concur. J. M. Pitner, George M. DuBose, for plaintiff in error, C. E. Sutton, contra,

cited: Civil Code (1910), §§ 4964, 4955, 6278; Hughes v. Coursey, 46 Ga. 116; East Tenn. &c. Ry. Co. v. Greene, 95 Ga. 37; McWilliams v. Standard &c. Co., 92 Ga. 438-9.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McIntyre v. Habersham Bank, 95 S.E. 306, 22 Ga. App. 21, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 109 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

95 S.E. 306 (McIntyre v. Habersham Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

UNION LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Aaronson
136 S.E.2d 142 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1964)