McIntyre v. GUARANTY BOND BANK

Court of Appeals of Texas

McIntyre v. GUARANTY BOND BANK

224 S.W.3d 721, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 5339, 2006 WL 1711820

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 22, 2006

Docket08-06-00063-CV

StatusPublished

This text of 224 S.W.3d 721 (McIntyre v. GUARANTY BOND BANK) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McIntyre v. GUARANTY BOND BANK, 224 S.W.3d 721, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 5339, 2006 WL 1711820 (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Justice.

Pending before the Court is a joint motion to dismiss the appeal with prejudice filed on May 30, 2006, by Appellant Debbie Jo McIntyre and Appellee Guaranty Bond Bank. See Tex.R.App.P. 42.1(a)(2). The parties represent to the Court that they have executed a settlement agreement releasing all claims existing between the parties and have agreed to dismiss this appeal. The parties have complied with the requirements of Rule 42.1(a)(2).

We have considered this cause on the motion and conclude that the motion should be granted in accordance with the agreements reached by the parties. Therefore, we GRANT the joint motion to dismiss and DISMISS this appeal with prejudice to the rights of either party to re-file same or any part thereof. Costs in this Court are taxed against Appellant. See Tex.R.App.P. 42.1(d).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Justice.

Pending before the Court is a joint motion to dismiss the appeal with prejudice filed on May 30, 2006, by Appellant Debbie Jo McIntyre and Appellee Guaranty Bond Bank. See Tex.R.App.P. 42.1(a)(2). The parties represent to the Court that they have executed a settlement agreement releasing all claims existing between the parties and have agreed to dismiss this appeal. The parties have complied with the requirements of Rule 42.1(a)(2).

We have considered this cause on the motion and conclude that the motion should be granted in accordance with the agreements reached by the parties. Therefore, we GRANT the joint motion to dismiss and DISMISS this appeal with prejudice to the rights of either party to re-file same or any part thereof. Costs in this Court are taxed against Appellant. See Tex.R.App.P. 42.1(d).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

224 S.W.3d 721, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 5339, 2006 WL 1711820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcintyre-v-guaranty-bond-bank-texapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack