McIntyre v. Ford Motor Co.

60 Pa. D. & C.2d 689, 1973 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 402
CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County
DecidedJanuary 24, 1973
Docketno. 65-8422
StatusPublished

This text of 60 Pa. D. & C.2d 689 (McIntyre v. Ford Motor Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McIntyre v. Ford Motor Co., 60 Pa. D. & C.2d 689, 1973 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 402 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1973).

Opinion

TREDINNICK, J.,

Arbitration in this trespass matter resulted in a verdict in favor of defendant. Plaintiff appealed, and defendant has filed a motion to quash that appeal since plaintiff failed to file a “praecipe ordering the case for trial on the civil trial list” within 20 days as required by local rule 806(1).

The Superior Court has recently determined that a statutory requirement that costs be paid in order to perfect an appeal from arbitration is directory only: Meta v. Yellow Cab Co., 222 Pa. Superior Ct. 469 (1972). Plaintiff argues that that precedent rules this case, and that the local rule in question must likewise be considered directory and not mandatory. For reasons set forth hereafter, we need not now determine that issue.

It will be noted that the quoted rule requires the filing of a trial praecipe. However, rule 262 of this court states that: “Cases shall be placed on the general civil trial list only upon certification of one of the judges of this court that such case has been pretried and is ready for trial.”

It is readily apparent that in requiring appellant to file a praecipe to place his case on the trial list as part of the appeal procedure, rule 806(1) asks him to do something which can only be accomplished by a judge of this court. Accordingly, the requirement is meaningless, and the motion to quash must be dismissed. The matter will be referred to the Civil Rules Committee to initiate corrective action.

ORDER

And now, January 24, 1973, the motion to quash is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meta v. Yellow Cab Co.
294 A.2d 898 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 Pa. D. & C.2d 689, 1973 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcintyre-v-ford-motor-co-pactcomplmontgo-1973.