McIntyre v. Commissioner

Eighth Circuit

McIntyre v. Commissioner

441 F. App'x 398

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided November 4, 2011·No. Nos. 11-1679, 11-1680·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated cases, Thomas and Deborah McIntyre appeal the tax court’s¹ decision upholding a determination made by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue of their liability for accuracy-related penalties. Upon careful review, see Namyst v. Comm’r, 435 F.3d 910, 912 (8th Cir.2006) (reviewing tax court’s findings of fact for clear error and its conclusions of law de novo), we conclude that the Commissioner’s determination was correct, for the reasons explained by the tax court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated cases, Thomas and Deborah McIntyre appeal the tax court’s¹ decision upholding a determination made by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue of their liability for accuracy-related penalties. Upon careful review, see Namyst v. Comm’r, 435 F.3d 910, 912 (8th Cir.2006) (reviewing tax court’s findings of fact for clear error and its conclusions of law de novo), we conclude that the Commissioner’s determination was correct, for the reasons explained by the tax court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

McIntyre v. Commissioner, 441 F. App'x 398 (8th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

441 F. App'x 398 (McIntyre v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related