Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/McIntosh v. Wratten

McIntosh v. Wratten

77 A.D.2d 810, 430 N.Y.S.2d 763, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12585
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 10, 1980
StatusPublished

This text of 77 A.D.2d 810 (McIntosh v. Wratten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McIntosh v. Wratten, 77 A.D.2d 810, 430 N.Y.S.2d 763, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12585 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: In 1971 plaintiffs sued defendants for personal injuries, alleging causes of action in negligence, breach of warranty and strict products liability. By order dated March 8, 1974 Special Term, applying the rule of Mendel v Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. (25 NY2d 340), dismissed the warranty and strict liability actions as time barred. No appeal was taken from that order. On this appeal plaintiffs seek to reverse a second order of Special Term which denied their application pursuant to CPLR 3025. By that application they sought to amend their complaint to reallege causes of action in breach of warranty and strict products liability now timely under Victorson v Bock Laundry Mach. Co. (37 NY2d 395). We find no abuse of discretion by Special Term in denying the application to amend (see Spindell v Brooklyn Jewish Hosp., 35 AD2d 962, affd 29 NY2d 888; Siegel, New York Practice, § 276; and see, generally, Matter of Gowan v Tully, 45 NY2d 32; Slater v American Min. Spirits Co., 33 NY2d 443; Meyer v Droms, 68 AD2d 942). (Appeal [811]*811from order of Jefferson Supreme Court—amend complaint.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Callahan, Doerr and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Slater v. American Mineral Spirits Co.
310 N.E.2d 300 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)
Mendel v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.
253 N.E.2d 207 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)
Spindell v. Brooklyn Jewish Hospital
278 N.E.2d 912 (New York Court of Appeals, 1972)
Victorson v. Bock Laundry Machine Co.
335 N.E.2d 275 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
Gowan v. Tully
379 N.E.2d 177 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
Spindell v. Brooklyn Jewish Hospital
35 A.D.2d 962 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1970)
Meyer v. Droms
68 A.D.2d 942 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 A.D.2d 810, 430 N.Y.S.2d 763, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcintosh-v-wratten-nyappdiv-1980.