McIntosh v. Sullivan
835 A.2d 475, 266 Conn. 926, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 463, 2003 WL 22884162
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedNovember 12, 2003
DocketSC 17094
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 835 A.2d 475 (McIntosh v. Sullivan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McIntosh v. Sullivan, 835 A.2d 475, 266 Conn. 926, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 463, 2003 WL 22884162 (Colo. 2003).
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 77 Conn. App. 641 (AC 22753), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiffs allegations did not fall outside the scope of General Statutes § 13a-144 as not involving a highway defect?”
VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
McIntosh v. Sullivan
875 A.2d 459 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2005)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
835 A.2d 475, 266 Conn. 926, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 463, 2003 WL 22884162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcintosh-v-sullivan-conn-2003.