McIntosh v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

McIntosh v. State

1968 OK CR 126, 444 P.2d 224

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJuly 17, 1968

DocketNo. A-14737

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1968 OK CR 126 (McIntosh v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McIntosh v. State, 1968 OK CR 126, 444 P.2d 224 (Okla. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

NIX, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff in Error, Selma Jo McIntosh, was convicted in the District Court of Oklahoma County with the crime of Grand Larceny, After Former Conviction of a Felony, and sentenced to Seven and one-half Years in the penitentiary. Her appeal was filed in this Court on April 24, 1968. Brief was due to be filed on or before May 24, 1968. None was filed, nor any extension of time requested. Therefore, on June 28, 1968, the cause was Summarily Submitted in accordance with Rules 6 and 9 of the Court of Criminal Appeals.

This is a companion case to Hill v. State, Okl.Cr., 444 P.2d 223, handed down July 17, 1968. Defendant Hill and Defendant McIntosh were tried together. The facts and the evidence are the same, and we will not discuss them herein.

This Court has carefully reviewed the record and find no fundamental error. The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict of the jury. The judgment and sentence is affirmed.

BRETT, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

NIX, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff in Error, Selma Jo McIntosh, was convicted in the District Court of Oklahoma County with the crime of Grand Larceny, After Former Conviction of a Felony, and sentenced to Seven and one-half Years in the penitentiary. Her appeal was filed in this Court on April 24, 1968. Brief was due to be filed on or before May 24, 1968. None was filed, nor any extension of time requested. Therefore, on June 28, 1968, the cause was Summarily Submitted in accordance with Rules 6 and 9 of the Court of Criminal Appeals.

This is a companion case to Hill v. State, Okl.Cr., 444 P.2d 223, handed down July 17, 1968. Defendant Hill and Defendant McIntosh were tried together. The facts and the evidence are the same, and we will not discuss them herein.

This Court has carefully reviewed the record and find no fundamental error. The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict of the jury. The judgment and sentence is affirmed.

BRETT, J., concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1968 OK CR 126, 444 P.2d 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcintosh-v-state-oklacrimapp-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack