McIntosh v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

McIntosh v. State

1919 OK CR 234, 182 P. 733, 16 Okla. Crim. 693, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 217

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJuly 31, 1919

DocketNo. A-3424.

StatusPublished

This text of 1919 OK CR 234 (McIntosh v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McIntosh v. State, 1919 OK CR 234, 182 P. 733, 16 Okla. Crim. 693, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 217 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The plaintiff in error, Monroe McIntosh, and Alice Dodd, were jointly charged with the murder of one Solon Dodd, alleged to have been committed in Haskell county on or about the 26th day of August, 1917, by giving and administering 7% grains of a certain deadly poison, to wit, “bichloride of mercury.”

A severance was asked and granted. Upon his separate trial the plaintiff in error was convicted and his punishment assessed at imprisonment in the penitentiary for life at hard labor. Prom the judgment and sentence rendered in accordance with the verdict on the 7th day of February, 1918, plaintiff in error appealed by filing in this court on August 7, 1918, a petition in error with case made.

*694 Plaintiff! in error by liis counsel of record has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal, which motion is sustained; and it is ordered and adjudged that tho appeal herein be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The plaintiff in error, Monroe McIntosh, and Alice Dodd, were jointly charged with the murder of one Solon Dodd, alleged to have been committed in Haskell county on or about the 26th day of August, 1917, by giving and administering 7% grains of a certain deadly poison, to wit, “bichloride of mercury.”

A severance was asked and granted. Upon his separate trial the plaintiff in error was convicted and his punishment assessed at imprisonment in the penitentiary for life at hard labor. Prom the judgment and sentence rendered in accordance with the verdict on the 7th day of February, 1918, plaintiff in error appealed by filing in this court on August 7, 1918, a petition in error with case made.

*694 Plaintiff! in error by liis counsel of record has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal, which motion is sustained; and it is ordered and adjudged that tho appeal herein be dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1919 OK CR 234, 182 P. 733, 16 Okla. Crim. 693, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcintosh-v-state-oklacrimapp-1919.