McIntosh v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McIntosh v. State

146 So. 3d 1291, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14864, 2014 WL 4696274

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 23, 2014

DocketNo. 1D14-1938

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 146 So. 3d 1291 (McIntosh v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McIntosh v. State, 146 So. 3d 1291, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14864, 2014 WL 4696274 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Michael Louis McIntosh is an inmate at the Suwannee Correctional Institution Annex in Live Oak. He appeals from an order denying his Motion To Correct Jail Credit, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801. The trial court determined that the record did not demonstrate on its face that McIntosh was entitled to relief. However, it failed to attach to its order any portion of the record supporting its conclusion. Rule 3.801(e), which incorporates Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure rule 3.850(f), requires the circuit court to attach to its order denying a motion seeking additional jail credit records that conclusively refute the motion. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.801(e); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(5) (“If the denial is based on the records in the case, a copy of that portion of the files and records that conclusively shows that the defendant is entitled [1292]*1292to no relief shall be attached to the final order.”); Geil v. State, 140 So.3d 691 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014); Williams v. State, 141 So.3d 686 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). We therefore reverse and remand with directions to the trial court to attach those portions of the record that conclusively refute McIntosh’s claims.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

PADOVANO, WETHERELL, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Michael Louis McIntosh is an inmate at the Suwannee Correctional Institution Annex in Live Oak. He appeals from an order denying his Motion To Correct Jail Credit, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801. The trial court determined that the record did not demonstrate on its face that McIntosh was entitled to relief. However, it failed to attach to its order any portion of the record supporting its conclusion. Rule 3.801(e), which incorporates Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure rule 3.850(f), requires the circuit court to attach to its order denying a motion seeking additional jail credit records that conclusively refute the motion. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.801(e); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(5) (“If the denial is based on the records in the case, a copy of that portion of the files and records that conclusively shows that the defendant is entitled [1292]*1292to no relief shall be attached to the final order.”); Geil v. State, 140 So.3d 691 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014); Williams v. State, 141 So.3d 686 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). We therefore reverse and remand with directions to the trial court to attach those portions of the record that conclusively refute McIntosh’s claims.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

PADOVANO, WETHERELL, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

146 So. 3d 1291, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14864, 2014 WL 4696274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcintosh-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack