McIntosh v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McIntosh v. State

586 So. 2d 1348, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13948, 1991 WL 209287

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McIntosh v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 532 So. 2d 1129 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 16, 1991·No. No. 90-03350·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mr. McIntosh appeals his conviction for possession of a short-barreled shotgun, his five-year minimum mandatory sentence, and the imposition of costs. We affirm on all points without discussion, but remand his sentence to the trial court for the correction of a scrivener’s error on the sentence form to reflect that the minimum mandatory sentence was imposed pursuant to section 790.221, Florida Statutes (1989).

SCHEB, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Mr. McIntosh appeals his conviction for possession of a short-barreled shotgun, his five-year minimum mandatory sentence, and the imposition of costs. We affirm on all points without discussion, but remand his sentence to the trial court for the correction of a scrivener’s error on the sentence form to reflect that the minimum mandatory sentence was imposed pursuant to section 790.221, Florida Statutes (1989).

SCHEB, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

McIntosh v. State, 586 So. 2d 1348, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13948, 1991 WL 209287 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

586 So. 2d 1348 (McIntosh v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.