McIntosh v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McIntosh v. State

586 So. 2d 1348, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13948, 1991 WL 209287

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 16, 1991

DocketNo. 90-03350

StatusPublished

This text of 586 So. 2d 1348 (McIntosh v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McIntosh v. State, 586 So. 2d 1348, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13948, 1991 WL 209287 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mr. McIntosh appeals his conviction for possession of a short-barreled shotgun, his five-year minimum mandatory sentence, and the imposition of costs. We affirm on all points without discussion, but remand his sentence to the trial court for the correction of a scrivener’s error on the sentence form to reflect that the minimum mandatory sentence was imposed pursuant to section 790.221, Florida Statutes (1989).

SCHEB, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Mr. McIntosh appeals his conviction for possession of a short-barreled shotgun, his five-year minimum mandatory sentence, and the imposition of costs. We affirm on all points without discussion, but remand his sentence to the trial court for the correction of a scrivener’s error on the sentence form to reflect that the minimum mandatory sentence was imposed pursuant to section 790.221, Florida Statutes (1989).

SCHEB, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

586 So. 2d 1348, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13948, 1991 WL 209287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcintosh-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.