McIntosh v. McIntosh

California Court of Appeal

McIntosh v. McIntosh

161 P.2d 407, 70 Cal. App. 2d 585, 1945 Cal. App. LEXIS 1108

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedAugust 25, 1945

DocketCiv. No. 7140

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 161 P.2d 407 (McIntosh v. McIntosh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McIntosh v. McIntosh, 161 P.2d 407, 70 Cal. App. 2d 585, 1945 Cal. App. LEXIS 1108 (Cal. Ct. App. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is an appeal by the intervenors from an order vacating a previous order permitting them to file in the above entitled divorce suit, their complaint in intervention alleging title or an interest in some of the property which is described and involved in the complaint for divorce.

After the appeal was submitted the intervenors’ attorneys advised this court their clients had disposed of all their interest in the property and that they “have no further interest in this proceeding.” In a written communication to this court, plaintiff’s attorney concedes that the intervenors have disposed of their interest in the property. Since the appellants have disposed of their interest in the property and they are no longer interested in the appeal, no useful purpose will be subserved by determining the issues on appeal.

It is therefore ordered that the appeal be and it is hereby dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

This is an appeal by the intervenors from an order vacating a previous order permitting them to file in the above entitled divorce suit, their complaint in intervention alleging title or an interest in some of the property which is described and involved in the complaint for divorce.

After the appeal was submitted the intervenors’ attorneys advised this court their clients had disposed of all their interest in the property and that they “have no further interest in this proceeding.” In a written communication to this court, plaintiff’s attorney concedes that the intervenors have disposed of their interest in the property. Since the appellants have disposed of their interest in the property and they are no longer interested in the appeal, no useful purpose will be subserved by determining the issues on appeal.

It is therefore ordered that the appeal be and it is hereby dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

161 P.2d 407, 70 Cal. App. 2d 585, 1945 Cal. App. LEXIS 1108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcintosh-v-mcintosh-calctapp-1945.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack