McIntosh v. International Talc Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McIntosh v. International Talc Co.

57 A.D.2d 671, 393 N.Y.S.2d 628, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11699

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 21, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 57 A.D.2d 671 (McIntosh v. International Talc Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McIntosh v. International Talc Co., 57 A.D.2d 671, 393 N.Y.S.2d 628, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11699 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed June 22, 1976. Appellants’ sole contention on appeal is that there is no substantial evidence to support the board’s finding that claimant’s arteriosclerotic heart disease was aggravated by his work-related talcosis to the extent he is totally disabled. The statements of Doctors Drury and Nash reach the same conclusion adopted by the board. Such statements in this context clearly constitute substantial evidence. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board against the employer and its insurance carrier. Sweeney, J. P., Mahoney, Main, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed June 22, 1976. Appellants’ sole contention on appeal is that there is no substantial evidence to support the board’s finding that claimant’s arteriosclerotic heart disease was aggravated by his work-related talcosis to the extent he is totally disabled. The statements of Doctors Drury and Nash reach the same conclusion adopted by the board. Such statements in this context clearly constitute substantial evidence. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board against the employer and its insurance carrier. Sweeney, J. P., Mahoney, Main, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 A.D.2d 671, 393 N.Y.S.2d 628, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcintosh-v-international-talc-co-nyappdiv-1977.