McIntire v. Wing

4 A. 197, 113 Pa. 67, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 334
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 24, 1886·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was filed

Per Curiam.

There is no error in the refusal of the court to take off the compulsoiy nonsuit. The evidence wholly failed to show that the defendants were in possession of the land in question; They were not served with the writ by the sheriff. The presumption of possession created by the statute, when the sheriff makes return under oath that he has duly served the writ on the defendants, does not exist. While an appearance and plea by counsel may lead to a verdict and judgment against the defendants, yet on the trial, it is necessary to prove that they were in possession of the premises. Failing in this, the nonsuit was properly entered. This view makes it unnecessary to consider the other questions.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McIntire v. Wing, 4 A. 197, 113 Pa. 67, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 334 (Pa. 1886).

4 A. 197 (McIntire v. Wing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rotunno Et Ux. v. Joseph Et Ux.
53 A.2d 825 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1947)
Wilford v. White
16 Pa. D. & C. 469 (Berks County Court of Common Pleas, 1931)
Skillman v. Magill
98 Pa. Super. 72 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1929)
Knoblauch v. Bankes
10 Pa. D. & C. 766 (Schuylkill County Court of Common Pleas, 1927)
Sautter v. Rowland
131 A. 733 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1925)
Kreamer v. Yoneida
62 A. 518 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1905)
Kreamer v. Voneida
24 Pa. Super. 347 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1904)
Lake Winola Ass'n v. Mott
1 Pa. Super. 304 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1896)