McIntire v. McIntire

15 A. 218, 64 N.H. 609
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1888·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Bingham, J.

Every child or issue of a child of a deceased testator not named or referred to in his will, and who is not a devisee *610 or legatee, shall be entitled to the same portion of the estate, both real and personal, as he would have been had the deceased died intestate. G. L., c. 193, s. 10; Gage v. Gage, 29 N. H. 533 : Farnum v. Bryant, 34 N. H. 9.

In such a case, if the property not devised or bequeathed shall be insufficient to satisfy the just share of the child, after allowing the advancements received by him, the insufficiency shall be con- ' tributed in just proportion from the property devised or bequeathed. G. L., c. 193, s. 11. The rights of the appellant are independent of the will, and are not affected by it.

Exception overruled.

Carpenter, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McIntire v. McIntire, 15 A. 218, 64 N.H. 609 (N.H. 1888).

15 A. 218 (McIntire v. McIntire) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dunham v. Stitzberg
201 P.2d 1000 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1948)
In Re Estate of Sankey
249 P. 517 (California Supreme Court, 1926)
Lowery v. Hawker
133 N.W. 918 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1911)