McIntire v. McIntire

15 A. 218, 64 N.H. 609
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedJune 5, 1888
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 15 A. 218 (McIntire v. McIntire) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McIntire v. McIntire, 15 A. 218, 64 N.H. 609 (N.H. 1888).

Opinion

Bingham, J.

Every child or issue of a child of a deceased testator not named or referred to in his will, and who is not a devisee *610 or legatee, shall be entitled to the same portion of the estate, both real and personal, as he would have been had the deceased died intestate. G. L., c. 193, s. 10; Gage v. Gage, 29 N. H. 533 : Farnum v. Bryant, 34 N. H. 9.

In such a case, if the property not devised or bequeathed shall be insufficient to satisfy the just share of the child, after allowing the advancements received by him, the insufficiency shall be con- ' tributed in just proportion from the property devised or bequeathed. G. L., c. 193, s. 11. The rights of the appellant are independent of the will, and are not affected by it.

Exception overruled.

Carpenter, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dunham v. Stitzberg
201 P.2d 1000 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1948)
In Re Estate of Sankey
249 P. 517 (California Supreme Court, 1926)
Lowery v. Hawker
133 N.W. 918 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 A. 218, 64 N.H. 609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcintire-v-mcintire-nh-1888.