McIntire v. First Far West Life Insurance
This text of 619 P.2d 1300 (McIntire v. First Far West Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment. Defendant issued a health and accident policy to plaintiff’s husband on November 9, 1978. She sued to recover benefits for medical bills incurred between November 16,1978, and his death from cancer in March, 1979. The insurer had refused to pay, relying on policy language excepting preexisting conditions from coverage.1 By way of an affirmative defense, the insurer alleged that the husband had "experienced direct symptoms of the sickness necessitating the treatment” before he bought the policy.
Defendant’s motion for summary judgment was signed by counsel. It contained in its "POINTS AND AUTHORITIES” allegations of facts2 which were claimed to be supported by "medical reports and records” which were attached to the motion but which were neither sworn to nor otherwise certified. There were no affidavits, depositions or admissions on file. Plaintiff’s counsel filed a memorandum in opposition to the motion for summary judgment and attached to it a letter by the physician who had first examined the husband on November 13, 1978. The letter was neither sworn to nor otherwise certified. Plaintiff filed no affidavits.
In short, there was nothing before the court on which it could base a summary judgment under either former ORS 18.105(2), (3) and (4),3 which was in effect [256]*256when the case was filed, or ORCP 47, which was in effect when the motion was filed and which is in all relevent respects identical to the statute. The defendant had the burden under the statute and the rule of showing the absence of a genuine issue of fact, but it failed to submit materials that would have permitted the trial court to make that determination. See Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co., 398 US 144, 90 S Ct 1598, 26 L Ed 2d 142 (1970).
Reversed and remanded.
We note that if a motion for summary judgment complying with the applicable provisions is again submitted, and if the supporting documentation is substance no more than that submitted this time, we would be inclined to agree with the appellant in the following excerpt from her brief:
"In short, there are material and genuine issues of fact to be determined in this case. Namely, whether the symptoms experienced by the insured, Mr. Mclntire, at the time this polity was purchased are 'direct symptoms’ in and of themselves which at that point in time were directly related to the very specific disease of lung carcinoma. Further, there are material issues of fact raised in this case pertaining to the construction of the policy terms themselves.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
619 P.2d 1300, 49 Or. App. 253, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcintire-v-first-far-west-life-insurance-orctapp-1980.