McInnis v. Ramasami

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McInnis v. Ramasami

692 So. 2d 300, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4832

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 30, 1997

DocketNos. 96-0968, 96-1522

StatusPublished

This text of 692 So. 2d 300 (McInnis v. Ramasami) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McInnis v. Ramasami, 692 So. 2d 300, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4832 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It is undisputed that the trial court erred by awarding attorney’s fees and costs to Appellees, as their offer of judgment was not timely filed under section 768.79, Florida Statutes (1995). Knealing v. Puleo, 675 So.2d 593 (Fla.1996). Therefore, as to attorney’s fees and costs, we reverse and remand for modification consistent with Knealing. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.

STONE, WARNER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

It is undisputed that the trial court erred by awarding attorney’s fees and costs to Appellees, as their offer of judgment was not timely filed under section 768.79, Florida Statutes (1995). Knealing v. Puleo, 675 So.2d 593 (Fla.1996). Therefore, as to attorney’s fees and costs, we reverse and remand for modification consistent with Knealing. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.

STONE, WARNER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

692 So. 2d 300, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcinnis-v-ramasami-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack