McInnis v. Bravo

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 21, 1997·No. 96-40981·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40981

LARRY D. McINNIS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ERASMO E. BRAVO ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-96-CV-345 - - - - - - - - - - April 7, 1997 Before KING, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Larry D. McInnis, Texas prisoner #651075, seeks leave to

proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on his appeal from the district

court’s order assessing the district-court filing fees required

by the Prison Litigation Act of 1995, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1).

His motion for leave to proceed IFP is DENIED.

McInnis paid an initial partial district-court filing fee of

more than the district court ordered him to pay. His appeal from

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-40981 - 2 -

the district court’s order therefore is moot, and we lack

jurisdiction to consider his contention that the district court’s

order was erroneous. Rocky v. King, 900 F.2d 864, 866-67 (5th

Cir. 1990).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McInnis v. Bravo, (5th Cir. 1997).

McInnis v. Bravo (McInnis v. Bravo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related