McInnis v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.

76 N.E. 911, 190 Mass. 386, 1906 Mass. LEXIS 1092

Opinion

Losing, J.

[After the foregoing statement of the case.] Passing by the fact that the question was in fact a preliminary one and treating it as a question asking where she said her husband had been, it was competent for the purpose for which it was admitted. The answer was not responsive. No objection was made to the answer and no motion was made to strike it out. The only exception before us is the exception to the question. That exception must be overruled.

So ordered.