McInnes v. Cannon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McInnes v. Cannon

225 A.D. 852

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1929

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 225 A.D. 852 (McInnes v. Cannon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McInnes v. Cannon, 225 A.D. 852 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Order modified by permitting an X-ray photograph to be taken in conjunction with a physical examination of the plaintiff, and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. This privilege, however, should not be abused, and should be limited to a time and place convenient to the plaintiff and by a physician designated by the court. (Hollister v. Robertson, 208 App. Div. 449.) Settle order on notice. Present — Dowling, P. J., Finch, McAvoy, Martin and O’Malley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order modified by permitting an X-ray photograph to be taken in conjunction with a physical examination of the plaintiff, and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. This privilege, however, should not be abused, and should be limited to a time and place convenient to the plaintiff and by a physician designated by the court. (Hollister v. Robertson, 208 App. Div. 449.) Settle order on notice. Present — Dowling, P. J., Finch, McAvoy, Martin and O’Malley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

225 A.D. 852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcinnes-v-cannon-nyappdiv-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack