McInnes v. Cannon
225 A.D. 852
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1929·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Order modified by permitting an X-ray photograph to be taken in conjunction with a physical examination of the plaintiff, and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. This privilege, however, should not be abused, and should be limited to a time and place convenient to the plaintiff and by a physician designated by the court. (Hollister v. Robertson, 208 App. Div. 449.) Settle order on notice. Present — Dowling, P. J., Finch, McAvoy, Martin and O’Malley, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McInnes v. Cannon, 225 A.D. 852 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).
225 A.D. 852 (McInnes v. Cannon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Feinberg v. Fairmont Holding Corp.
272 A.D.2d 101 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1947)
Mitchell v. Pure Oil Co.
20 F. Supp. 1021 (E.D. New York, 1937)