McInerney v. New York World-Telegram Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McInerney v. New York World-Telegram Corp.

251 A.D. 741, 297 N.Y.S. 687, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7329

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 21, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 251 A.D. 741 (McInerney v. New York World-Telegram Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McInerney v. New York World-Telegram Corp., 251 A.D. 741, 297 N.Y.S. 687, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7329 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying defendant’s motion to compel plaintiff to [742]*742state separately and number the causes of action contained in the complaint, or, in the alternative, to strike out paragraphs tenth and eleventh thereof and Exhibits “ B ” and “ C,” thereto annexed, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted to the extent of striking out said paragraphs and exhibits. (De Groot v. Brooklyn Daily Times, No. 1, 233 App. Div. 774.) Defendant has leave to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying defendant’s motion to compel plaintiff to [742]*742state separately and number the causes of action contained in the complaint, or, in the alternative, to strike out paragraphs tenth and eleventh thereof and Exhibits “ B ” and “ C,” thereto annexed, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted to the extent of striking out said paragraphs and exhibits. (De Groot v. Brooklyn Daily Times, No. 1, 233 App. Div. 774.) Defendant has leave to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 A.D. 741, 297 N.Y.S. 687, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcinerney-v-new-york-world-telegram-corp-nyappdiv-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack