McInerney v. Myrold

189 N.W.2d 42, 385 Mich. 592, 1971 Mich. LEXIS 210
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 27, 1971
DocketNo. 7; Docket No. 52,980
StatusPublished

This text of 189 N.W.2d 42 (McInerney v. Myrold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McInerney v. Myrold, 189 N.W.2d 42, 385 Mich. 592, 1971 Mich. LEXIS 210 (Mich. 1971).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon review and consideration at conference of the oral arguments of respective counsel, the opinion of Division 1 (McInerney v. [593]*593Myrold [1970], 23 Mich App 748) is ordered adopted as the opinion of this Court.

Affirmed. Costs to appellee-defendant Bill Henderson’s Eastgate Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.

T. M. Kavanagh, C. J., and Black, Adams, T. E. Brennan, T. G. Kavanagh, Swainson, and Williams, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McInerney v. Myrold
179 N.W.2d 710 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
189 N.W.2d 42, 385 Mich. 592, 1971 Mich. LEXIS 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcinerney-v-myrold-mich-1971.