McIlvaine v. PARAMOUNT BOND & MORTGAGE CO., INC.
This text of 360 S.W.3d 835 (McIlvaine v. PARAMOUNT BOND & MORTGAGE CO., INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Michelle Mcllvaine (Plaintiff) appeals the summary judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County in favor of Paramount Mortgage Company (Paramount) on Plaintiffs action for violation of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act (MPA) and negligent misrepresentation. Plaintiff claims that the trial court erred in granting Paramount summary judgment because a genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether Paramount’s failure to advise Plaintiff that there were tax liens on her property caused Plaintiff to suffer damages.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error in any of the respects alleged. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the Commission’s judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
360 S.W.3d 835, 2011 WL 6640218, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcilvaine-v-paramount-bond-mortgage-co-inc-moctapp-2011.