McIlvain v. State ex rel. Emery

Indiana Supreme Court

McIlvain v. State ex rel. Emery

87 Ind. 602

Indiana Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1882·No. No. 10,451·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Woods, C. J.

The appellant disputes the constitutionality of so much of the law concerning prosecutions in cases of bastardy as requires the imprisonment of the defendant upon his failure to pay or replevy the judgment rendered against him. We do not consider the question an open one. Lower v. Wallick, 25 Ind. 68; Ex parte Teague, 41 Ind. 278 ; Reynolds v. Lamount, 45 Ind. 308; Turner v. Wilson, 49 Ind. 581.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woods, C. J.

The appellant disputes the constitutionality of so much of the law concerning prosecutions in cases of bastardy as requires the imprisonment of the defendant upon his failure to pay or replevy the judgment rendered against him. We do not consider the question an open one. Lower v. Wallick, 25 Ind. 68; Ex parte Teague, 41 Ind. 278 ; Reynolds v. Lamount, 45 Ind. 308; Turner v. Wilson, 49 Ind. 581.

Judgment affirmed.

McIlvain v. State ex rel. Emery, 87 Ind. 602 (Ind. 1882).

Pincite

87 Ind. 602 (McIlvain v. State ex rel. Emery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related