McIlhaney & Co. v. F. M. Hoyt Shoe Co.

228 F. 1021, 142 C.C.A. 667, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2084
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 21, 1915
DocketNo. 1370
StatusPublished

This text of 228 F. 1021 (McIlhaney & Co. v. F. M. Hoyt Shoe Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McIlhaney & Co. v. F. M. Hoyt Shoe Co., 228 F. 1021, 142 C.C.A. 667, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2084 (4th Cir. 1915).

Opinion

Appeal from the District Court of the United States at Columbia, S. C., in Bankruptcy. Appeal [1022]*1022dismissed on motion of appellants.

Dunlap, Dunlap & Hollis, of Bock Hill, S. C., and Arthur L. Gaston, of Chester, S. G., for appellant. Thos. F. Me-Dow, of York, S. C., and B. J. White, of Bock Hill, S. G., for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
228 F. 1021, 142 C.C.A. 667, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2084, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcilhaney-co-v-f-m-hoyt-shoe-co-ca4-1915.